Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • in reply to: Location Sign for Strata Complex #18236

    Jimmy: Looks like I will need to go to CTTT.   Can the EC be liable for ‘personal legal liability’ if they do not fulfill a basic EC responsibility (maintenance of common property) or if a residence doesn’t receive timely medical assistance due to the location sign that is missing (OHS)?  Yell

    in reply to: Location Sign for Strata Complex #18053

    Thanks for your info.  I sent our Managing Agent the e-mail on 18/2/13.  He is a decent fellow and was keen to get the sign replaced – he sent me a copy of his e-mail to the EC.   He understands the ‘safety issue’.  I am going to follow-up next week, as I haven’t heard from EC nor the Managing Agent.  I think 4 weeks is a fair amount of time to follow-up the issue.  Funny how all the visitors who aren’t supposed to access our private driveway can find the place, yet new tradesmen I have employed can’t!!

    in reply to: Noisy Bird #18052

    Thank you to all those who have replied. Answering Driven to Annoyance, the Noisy Bird I have since found out is a Cockatiel, and some stratas have banned them, because of the resultant noise in confined living spaces.  It sounds like they are blowing a referee’s whistle all day. (LOUD!)  I defy anyone to stay home all day, without TV or music playing and have to listen to this torture.  As mentioned, our area has lots of birds, they make their noise and go away.  This noise is CONSTANT.  Also I’m not in a building/unit – the bird can be heard CLEARLY on the other side of the complex, so that’s says it all.  The Noisy Bird arrived about 4 weeks ago and already half the complex is complaining. 

    in reply to: Protocol #17484

    Thanks for all the good info.  To answer who is telling the serial offenders not to take any notice of the official letters/by-laws under wind-screens is the inexperienced Chairperson and the SM they instructed to send out a letter re ‘bogus letters and notes’. This Chairperson accepted assistance for a while but now knows it all.  (New resident who is not familiar with history of our strata.)  They’ve also indicated that the SM only works for them, no-one else.  Accepted that the SM takes directions from the EC/Chairperson, but the SM does work for us all.  The Chairperson is now telling the serial offenders to ring the SM and verify that the letter/by-laws has come from them.    Not sure what the SM is actually telling these residents, but feel it is to ignore the letter unless it has been posted.   This is why some residents are making sure the letters/by-laws are actually received because the strata roll isn’t updated, or landlords won’t pass the info on to their tenants. The SM did ask for updated details, e-mail addresses, etc, but people are slack and haven’t supplied.  The Chairperson was previously informed that a couple of the residences are in the old name and hence correspondence won’t be received – The new resident will just forward the mail to the old resident or bin it.  So, the Chairperson knows of the practice and has ignored any advice.  We suggested that they get the correspondence from the SM and actually place in the letterboxes themselves.  All the while we are being charged for photo copying and postage and the correspondence not being received.  The serial offenders (not only parking) are having a grand old time ‘doing their own thing’.  Our new Chairperson is also not screening the correspondence being sent out by the SM – the contents are not covering off on all issues and hence leaves gaps for offenders to ignore.  Yell

    in reply to: Protocol #17467

    @JimmyT said:
    Your EC should be the people to stick notices under windscreen wipers and issue Notices To Comply but if they won’t do the former, then there’s no reason you can’t (apart from the potential for personal confrontation). And if they won’t issue NtCs then you can go to Fair Trading and ask them to issue one on your behalf.

    Our EC issues appropriate letters (with the next letter being an NTC).  However, they have incorrect names (not updated with SM) and the problem parkers are not receiving the letters.  Other residents are placing a copy of the letter under windscreen wipers. Now residents are being threatened with legal action for issuing these official SM letters because they are issuing letters not signed by them but by the SM.  The problem parkers are being told to ignore any letters on their windscreens.  This escalates the issue because problem parkers are now ignoring every letter they get, for all types of issues (serial offenders).  Can residents have action taken against them for re-issuing the official letter and/or official by-laws? Confused

Viewing 5 replies - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)