- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by .
-
Topic
-
Hi,
We bought our apartment ”off the plan” and I was wondering if I am in a position to have the Unit entitlements queried?
Some background.
We have 12 identical ground floor apartments with identical outlooks and only a very minor variation in size. see below;
Unit 1C (lot 67) 85 sqm UE 697 = $883.95 (no parking)Unit 2C (lot 68) 105 sqm UE 778 = $986.70Unit 3C (lot 1) 99 sqm UE 691 = $876.35Unit 4C (lot 2) 101 sqm UE 685= $868.75Unit 5C (lot 3) 101 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 6C (lot 4) 102 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 7C (lot 5) 101 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 8C (lot 6) 101 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 9C (lot 7) 101 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 10C (lot 8) 101 sqm UE 698 = $885.25Unit 11C (lot 9) 87sqm UE 617 = $782.50 (no parking)Unit 12C (lot 10) 101 sqm UE 718 = $910.6This was a staged development and as such some apartments were purchased for different prices. Obviously, the earlier you purchased the lower the price as the developer was still trying to secure finance.
However, all apartments had been purchased 15 months prior to the Strata Plan being registered.
It is my understanding that Unit Entitlements are based on market value at the time the Strata plan is registered and not on purchase price, is this correct?
As I said all apartments are identical, with the same outlook – 1C and 12C being the end apartments do not have an adjoining apartment on one side, that is the only advantage I can see.
We think they have possibly allocated the Unit Entitlements on sale price & not market value. 2C was one of the last purchased (at a higher price) and has the highest unit entitlement – also interestingly 11C which has the lowest entitlement by far was purchased by one of the real estate agents selling the development.
Also is the following correct:
“IF less than 2 years has elapsed since your Strata Scheme was Registered then a revision of the Schedule of Unit Entitlements for as few as one Lot can be achieved without the need for Orders by the Tribunal, and without the concurrence of all Owners.”
Many thanks
Connie
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.