› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Strata Committees › Current Page
- This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 3 months ago by .
-
CreatorTopic
-
19/08/2016 at 10:05 pm #10593
Hi, I have just moved into my unit, I live in NSW. When I attended my first Agm I noticed that we did not have any office bearers insurance selected on our insurance.
When I asked our SM about this he said no OB insurance was needed as the EC do not vote or make decisions on anything that was financial.
Now at this meeting we voted to have new carpet put down in all our stairwells and the only owners present at the meeting were owners who were on the EC. No other owners came.
Isnt this a financial decision that was made by the EC and if so, if anything went wrong, could the EC be leaving themselves potentially exposed.
What does the new legislation say about this and is this optional? This is the first group of strata units that I have lived in that do not have office bearers insurance. Is there cause for concern. I am worried that this decision is not being cautious enough?
Thanks
-
CreatorTopic
-
AuthorReplies
-
20/08/2016 at 10:59 am #25305
That seems odd advice. Once a budget is set by the AGM, the EC makes financial decisions consistent with the budget. Let’s say there is a general maintenance line. The EC might decide to use some of that on something that needs fixing during the year, or it might decide it is not that serious and doesn’t fix it. If it turns out that was a poor decision and something bad happens as a result, they would want to have some insurance, I would have thought.
My impression was that typical strata insurance packages include office bearer’s insurance as part of the deal.
20/08/2016 at 11:42 am #25306I agree with Peter, that seems odd and merits further inquiry.
Some insurance policies have exclusions on EC insurance, such as for defamation, because internal politics can become quite nasty and very few people understand the limitations of free speech and fair comment, under the law.
Other insurance policies will reduce premiums by having an excess so that the first few hundred of any claim is covered by the owners corp.
Admittedly the new laws in NSW excuse liability of individual EC members who have acted in good faith.
But if you have, say, a secretary who allows changes to common property on a nod and a wink, and the EC is aware that proper procedure is not being followed, you could be up for tens of thousands of dollars in damages if things go wrong.
Similarly, if the EC has been told by a qualified person that there is a problem, but they decide to do nothing about it and hope nothing happens, then they are not acting in good faith and could be liable if disaster happens.
It’s a minefield – your EC really needs to look at your insurance policy and ask themselves if it’s worth potentially losing thousands of dollars just to save a few bucks. Personally, I wouldn’t serve on an EC that didn’t have proper insurance.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
20/08/2016 at 11:44 am #25307Yes I agree, I think it’s an odd answer that to me doesn’t make much sense. On our insurance policy, the option is there but it is not selected. When I wanted to include it the SM said the EC don’t make any financial decisions so it wasn’t necessary and said that nothing further will be done.
As a matter of interest, the first thing the SM said to the owners at the AGM that I attended, was that we could be on the EC but that we would do absolutely nothing? The other owners appeared to be accepting of this. This has left me feeling like the SM has too much control and is used to a totally free rein. I feel uncomfortable blindly going along and haven’t ever had this type of setup with a SM.
20/08/2016 at 11:57 am #25309@Susanp said:
The first thing the SM said to the owners at the AGM that I attended, was that we could be on the EC but that we would do absolutely nothing? The other owners appeared to be accepting of this.Is your Strata Manager a statutory appointment (probably due to mismanagement of the scheme by a previous EC)? It certainly sounds like it.
If that’s the case, then they do have absolute power and all you and your fellow owners can do is act responsibly, have your committee meeting in a purely advisory capacity and hope that you can take back control of your building when the statutory appointment runs out and you have proved yourselves to be good strata citizens.
The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
20/08/2016 at 12:22 pm #25310Yes the SM has run things for over 20 yrs.He was appointed by previous EC.
I don’t know when the SM agreement runs out or what type of strata agreement is in place as I cannot access any information about anything including the strata roll.
If I can’t resolve the inadequate insurance I will resign from EC, which I find amazing in this day and age.
20/08/2016 at 1:09 pm #25312Don’t resign – that’s how these people get to stay in control. If this strata manager is not a statutory appointment, then he is a dinosaur who really shouldn’t be operating in this day and age.
Send a letter to the strata manager asking on what grounds the EC can’t make any decisions.
If he is a statutory appointment, that’s one thing but if he is saying, for instance, that the Owners Corp has delegated all function to him, as many do, the EC can at any time supersede the Strata Manager.
If he is not a statutory appointment, then he has seriously misled owners and that is a sackable offence.
That’s the law. He has to do what you tell him, not the other way round.
Ask the strata manager if he is a member of SCA and if not, why not.
Ask him on what grounds you are not being given access to the strata roll as this is a clear contravention of section 108 of the strata Act (below).
Ask the manager if he has heard of the principle of “prevention is better than cure” in regard to your tree issue.
Ask the strata manager for a copy of the management agreement under which he was appointed.
You may be in a block where the EC’s only concern is to keep levies low. However, you collectively have a legal obligation to maintain and repair common property that your strata manager shouldn’t be helping your owners to shirk.
He probably does this becasue it keeps him onside with the owners. However, we are right in the middle of a major review of strata law and there is no place for old school thinking, especially when your EC isn’t covered by insurance.
Division 4 Inspection of records and issue of certificates
108 Inspection of records of owners corporation
(1) Who may inspect records?
An owner, mortgagee or covenant chargee of a lot, or a person authorised by the owner, mortgagee or covenant chargee, may request the owners corporation to allow an inspection to be carried out under this section.(2) Form of request
The request must be in writing and be accompanied by the fee prescribed by the regulations.(3) Items to be made available for inspection
The owners corporation must make the following items available for inspection by the person who makes the request or the person’s agent:(a) the strata roll,
(b) any records or documents required to be kept under Division 2,
(c) the plans, specifications, certificates, diagrams and other documents required to be delivered to the owners corporation at its first annual general meeting by the original owner or lessor,
(d) if in its custody or under its control, the certificate of title comprising the common property or, in the case of a leasehold strata scheme, the certificate of title for the lease of the common property,
(e) the last financial statements prepared,
(f) every current policy of insurance taken out by the owners corporation and the receipt for the premium last paid for each such policy,
(g) any other record or document in the custody or under the control of the owners corporation,
(h) if the duties of the owners corporation under this subsection have been delegated to a strata managing agent, such other records (including records of the strata managing agent) relating to the strata scheme as may be prescribed by the regulations,
(i) if a caretaker agreement is in force or has been entered into but has not yet commenced, a copy of the caretaker agreement.
Maximum penalty: 2 penalty units.
(4) Inspection to take place at agreed place and time
The inspection is to take place at such time and place as may be agreed on and, failing agreement, at the parcel at a time and on a date fixed by the owners corporation under subsection (5).(5) Time and place of inspection if agreement not reached
If an applicant and the owners corporation fail to reach an agreement within 3 days after the owners corporation receives the application, the owners corporation must immediately send by post to the applicant a notice fixing a specified time (between 9 am and 8 pm) on a specified date (not later than 10 days after the owners corporation receives the application).(6) Copies of documents may be taken
A person entitled to inspect a document under this section may take extracts from, or make a copy of, the document but must not, without the consent of the owners corporation, remove the document from the custody of the owners corporation.The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
20/08/2016 at 1:13 pm #25313Thanks for all that information. I don’t know if he is a statutory appointment. Sorry to sound ignorant but I don’t know what a statutory appointment means?
And yes the other owners are afraid of raising levies but the SM is always is not helping -always telling us- we have to keep levies low no matter what.
I will read all this information you have supplied me and I will certainly do what I can and raise all these issues. At least I can verbalise all this and perhaps it might give a measure of confidence in the other owners who have put up with this for years.
Now if I absolutely fail at succeeding with anything, and I am forced to resign due to lack of adequate insurance cover, can I put my complaint in writing and submit it to the SM requesting that all the other owners are made aware of my reasons? If so where would he place this so the OC see it?
20/08/2016 at 5:42 pm #25319A statutory appointment is where the strata manager has been appointed by an adjudicator in response to an application under the Act. You see that where a strata scheme has been badly mismanaged and the manager is appointed to make all the decisions for the scheme. The effect is that the owners have no part in the decisions made for that scheme.
Now if the strata manager has been the manager for 20 years I would venture there isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that he has been appointed by an adjudicator. Those types of appointments simply can’t last that long.
It may be that the terms of the manager’s appointment delegate all the functions of the owners to him, but that is very unwise. As Jimmy suggests I think you should start by asking for a copy of that agreement.
Also – in relation to your question about the general meeting, the fact that only the members of the EC were in attendance doesn’t matter, it was a general meeting, not an EC meeting so they were there in their capacity as owners at a general meeting. The decision was a decision of the owners, not the EC. Note that if you were all voting at the GM on the carpet matter that indicates that the strata manager is not a statutory appointment, because otherwise he would be making that decision.
It sounds to me like you need to get rid of this person as soon as possible.
20/08/2016 at 6:41 pm #25321I would add that even if the SM is wonderful and the EC and OC are both entirely happy to delegate everything to the SM, the EC still ultimately is the boss of the SM on behalf of the OC and carries the can ultimately. The EC could decide that on some particular issue it disagrees with the SM and then it directs the SM to do what it wants to have done. The SM is your employee, not the other way around.
20/08/2016 at 9:26 pm #25327Thanks so much for your replies. This is valuable information that I will seriously take on board. I do agree that we could do better with the SM. Now that I have this feed back I have a starting point to work from. I think in my situation the new strata laws are going to force changes upon the SM and will hopefully work to my advantage. Once again thank you all for your comments.
-
AuthorReplies
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
› Flat Chat Strata Forum › Strata Committees › Current Page