Flat Chat Strata Forum Living in strata Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #8152
    villageidiot
    Flatchatter

      I would like some advice on Resolutions. Our building contains eight lots, all of equal worth in terms of voting rights. At our upcoming AGM we will be voting on various issues.

      My understanding is an Ordinary Resolution requires 50% of the vote in favour to pass, (so in our case four votes in favour out of the eight) a Special Resolution requires 75% (six votes in favour from eight) and a Unanimous Resolution 100% (eight votes in favour from eight)

      My question is how is it determined as to which issues requires which level of resolution?

      In our particular case for example, what level of resolution is required for our building to do the following?

      1. Introduce a bylaw preventing smoking on all common property and balconies.

      2. Introduce a bylaw preventing smoking in all areas of the building including common property, balconies and within private lots.

      3. Rescind a special bylaw introduced about 15 years ago which currently totally prevents the keeping of animals, and thereby reverting our buildings ‘Keeping of Animals’ bylaw to the standard one where the keeping of animals requires permission but ‘permission cannot be unreasonably refused’?

      Also, what happens if some lot owners dont vote at all, either by not attending the AGM in person or by proxy? For example, if two owners don’t bother to vote does the 75% of the vote required to pass a special resolution still require 6 votes from the eight to be in favour, (ie the six remaining owners all have to vote yes) or does it then become 75% of those 6 votes remaining which means 4.5 votes out of 6, which I imagine would be rounded up to 5 out of 6 which is a considerably higher percentage (83%) than than the original 75% required which would disadvantage those owners trying to get the resolutions passed..

      Thanks in advance!

    Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #15549
      Whale
      Flatchatter

        Each of the items that you have listed involves Special By-Laws, and requires a Special Resolution at your General Meeting where no more than 25% of those Proprietors in attendance (personally or by proxy) vote against the Motion.

        I’m a non-smoker, but I’d urge you not to become too caught up in the recent publicity about non-smoking By-Laws, particularly as I seriously doubt that an Owners Corporation can create a Special By-Law that prevents residents from smoking inside their Lots. 

        In any event, remember that even if passed, none of the items mentioned in your post has any legal standing unless each is properly Registered on the Title of your Plan.

        Best of luck! 

        #15550
        villageidiot
        Flatchatter
        Chat-starter

          Thanks Whale for your reply. Our building has been thinking about this for a long time, before all the recent publicity. Of the owners and owner occupiers in our building of eight lots, not one is a smoker, so we think we have the numbers to pass this. Even if the Special Resolution is passed (and the special by-law added to our Strata Plan) that prevents smoking, even though it may be difficult to enforce it will certainly make prospective new owners think twice before buying into our building should a present owner decide to sell in the future. New owners will know in advance that smoking will not be looked upon favourably and hopefully this will persude smokers not to buy in.

          Please note though that a Special By-Law that prevents residents from smoking inside their Lots is already in place in a number of buildings in Australia.

          You can read more about these at this link

          https://www.ashaust.org.au/lv4/housing.htm

          and then scrolling down to SMOKEFREE STRATA BYLAWS.

          #15557
          Sir Humphrey
          Strataguru

            With the caveat that I am in the ACT, I would expect that an ordinary resolution is >50%, not just 50%, so in your case that would be 5 of 8 if all take part in the meeting, 4 of 6 or 7 if 1 or 2 don’t take part (in person or by proxy), 3 out of 4 if half your members don’t take part and so on. 

            As all your units have the same value a poll vote where votes are weighted by unit entitlements would make no difference. 

            A recent discussion on ‘voting on a special resolution’ might be relevant here. 

            Again with the caveat that I am not in NSW, I think a special resolution (which you need for a by-law) is also based on whoever takes part. If a few members do not show up or put in a proxy/absentee vote then the vote would be based on 75% of the 5, 6 or 7 members who do take part. 

            I assume that (like the ACT) a bylaw in NSW is subordinate to the Strata Act and other legislation. So you could only ban smoking (or anything else) if there is not some other law preventing you from banning it. I would think you would not have a problem banning it on the common property but within units might be harder to enforce or defend. I would be pointing out to owners who might not feel strongly about the issue that their unit value is likely to be greater rather than less if they could sell their property as part of a non-smoking building. 

            #15560
            villageidiot
            Flatchatter
            Chat-starter

              @PeterC said:
              With the caveat that I am in the ACT, I would expect that an ordinary resolution is >50%, not just 50%, so in your case that would be 5 of 8 if all take part in the meeting, 4 of 6 or 7 if 1 or 2 don’t take part (in person or by proxy), 3 out of 4 if half your members don’t take part and so on. 

              As all your units have the same value a poll vote where votes are weighted by unit entitlements would make no difference. 

              A recent discussion on ‘voting on a special resolution’ might be relevant here. 

              Again with the caveat that I am not in NSW, I think a special resolution (which you need for a by-law) is also based on whoever takes part. If a few members do not show up or put in a proxy/absentee vote then the vote would be based on 75% of the 5, 6 or 7 members who do take part. 

              I assume that (like the ACT) a bylaw in NSW is subordinate to the Strata Act and other legislation. So you could only ban smoking (or anything else) if there is not some other law preventing you from banning it. I would think you would not have a problem banning it on the common property but within units might be harder to enforce or defend. I would be pointing out to owners who might not feel strongly about the issue that their unit value is likely to be greater rather than less if they could sell their property as part of a non-smoking building. 

              Thanks for the advice Peter.

              Moderator/Jimmy T you may like to repost this thread in the ‘Smoking’ section of this forum as well. I am sure many others would be very interested, especially in this link about smoking in Strata buildings which is very enlightening.

              https://www.ashaust.org.au/lv4/…..ousing.htm

              I hope in the recent review of Strata Laws that the government takes a much stronger stance on preventing smoking in Strata buildings. They know the serious health implications of smoking and passive smoking, thats why smoking has been banned in all public buildings, office buildings, shopping centres, bus shelters, restaurants, pubs and clubs and many other places throughout Australia.  We should be able to choose to stop it in our own homes.

            Viewing 4 replies - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
            • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

            Flat Chat Strata Forum Living in strata Current Page