- This topic has 4 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by .
-
Topic
-
We have bought a lovely little unit in a block of four in Randwick 2 years ago. Since our costly renovation we have spent approx. $20K on other common property rectifications (new back stairs, new fence etc…).
Now there is a 3 yr old issue brought to our attention by the new strata managers (in place for about 9 months) requiring more money – a leaky front window causing damp and mould in the unit below. If the rectifications had taken place when they should have 3 years ago, we wouldn’t be facing a more expensive fix now.
We are the only new owners since this work was identified as being needed and we feel that we shouldn’t have to contribute (again) to works that were needed before we purchased and that would have been much cheaper to rectify at the time, and that should have been brought to our attention by the previous strata managers prior to purchase, but were not.
The unit in question is not well maintained by either the occupier or the owner and they have probably contributed to the problem by not keeping the tracks of the windows clear, clean and lubricated. I understand the mould problem is an owner problem but the window (and its rotting surround) is common property but the damage is not visible from the outside, only the inside of the unit.
So if the owner and the occupier have let the problem compound, and the owners of the other units have known about the problem but left it unattended, what rights do I have as a new owner to oppose contributing to yet another historical problem with the block?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.