Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page

  • Creator
    Topic
  • #7792

    Message:
    I would greatly appreciate your advice.
    I have an apartment on the lowest level of apartments in a large
    apartment block in Sydney CBD. Recently whilst I was away there
    was a blockage in the common property sewage pipe which caused sewage
    to backflow through my laundry drain through the hall and entrance and
    onto common property outside my door.

    The sewage also backflowed through drains in the adjoining apartment where damage was even more extensive. I have been told it was from a build up of sand and cement which blocked the drain. I have to replace my carpet and unfortunately overlooked contents insurance which after realising my mistake although too late I have since taken out.

    I am told that the strata insurance will pay for next doors expensive replacement of parquetry as it is a fixture and also carpet in the common area but not in my unit. I have written to the executive committee and asked as the damage was related solely to a common property fault, which they do not deny, if a fair and reasonable compromise could be agreed on.

    They declined saying they couldn't make exceptions. As well as seeming
    ethically unfair I have been told that just because I did not have insurance does not mean the owners corporation is not legally liable for damage caused by common property. As it is a health issue the carpet in the affected area of the common area and my unit has been taken up but there is still a bad odour and some concern about the skirting boards.

    I do not have the funds at present, so would have to borrow to buy new carpet so I would be really grateful if you could advise me if there is an easy option to claim for the cost or even partial cost of replacing my carpet without incurring legal expenses.

    I am not sure if it is related to the sewage blockage but the building has undergone a major refurbishment of the pool and gym which my apartment is directly over so I was the most affected of all units in the building by noise and vibrations from jackhammering and as I work shift work was forced to sleep elsewhere when I needed to sleep during the day.

    I never complained about this or any other issue so feel perturbed by the lack of return goodwill. Any advice would be very much appreciated.

Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Replies
  • #14282
    Jimmy-T
    Keymaster

      Here's all you need to know.  The Owners Corp is liable – end of story.

      Your EC/building manager needs a serious wake-up call.  This is their problem and they have to fix it pronto.  How dare they say you have to pay for this yourself?  When a similar thing happened in the Horizon building a few years age they rehoused all affected owners in a luxury hotel and did an industrial clean of their apartments.

      Now, your building manager can either do this the easy way or the hard way. They can get on to this pronto – no arguments, no delays and no compromises –  or you can take them to the Supreme Court (forget the CTTT) and demand damages for the repair and replacement and the cost of a proper clean-up, plus damages for the stress they have subjected you to (which is rising the more they delay), and all court costs.

      In fact, I would get a lawyer to draft a letter saying exactly that (and include their legal fees in the demand).

      This is a disgusting (in so many ways) abrogation of the owners corporation's responsibilities and they should be grateful you aren't a more demanding owner.

      When they're done cleaning up your apartment, they should take a course in strata law and OC responsibilities.  Let us know how you go.

      The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
      #14289

      Thanks so much Jimmy for your informative advise. I just couldn't understand from what I had been advised that the conflicting view of the body corporate made sense and suspect as I am young they were just hoping I would let it go rather than take action so am very
      grateful for clarification. I have now corresponded with solicitors who again re-inforced that I am entitled to compensation and the first step is to send a letter of demand to the body corporate and take it from there.
      A bit more information for you – As I was away my mother (who also owns a unit in the building) became involved in my absense.
      The building's cleaner did  “clean” the carpet during my absense after the
      sewage spill but there was still a bad smell so my mother made calls to 
      specialised  carpet cleaners who said they couldn't do anything as Australian Standards stipulate that sewage damaged carpets cannot be cleaned for health reasons as it takes very high temperatures to kill the germs which is not possible with carpets.  She then informed the building manager of this. The carpet in the common area outside my apartment had already been removed. My parents requested immediate help in taking up my carpet and cleaning the laundry as there were little bits of toilet paper etc under the sink and washing machine – and it also posed a  health risk from microbial contamination. The building staff were helpful in this matter and washed the laundry floor and concrete floor with disinfectant and metho after the affected carpet was removed. The building manager has also organised now for yearly inspections of the pipe to avoid a recurrence of future blockages.

      There is still however a mouldy smell in my apartment and the common area outside so I am unconvinced the cleanup is all it should have been. I had belongings on the floor and in the bottom of the linen cupboard which had green and white mould / bacteria growing on them so they were thrown out. They were not of significant value however so it is only the replacement carpet that I am concerned about being compensated for. My mother ran into the building manager after the executive committee meeting who advised her they would direct me to try and claim through their insurance however this seems a “cop out” as we had already been advised previously their insurance would not be responsible for my carpet as it was not a fixture and  would only be responsible for the skirting boards which are a fixture and have very slightly buckled. To replace them however would mean repainting which apparently again would be at my own expense so I would rather they remained.
      My mother then requested to speak to the executive committee chairman who was sympathetic but basically seems to think if they compensated me it may only make the other owners reluctant to get contents insurance and did not seem to understand the body corporate would be liable.
      After now clarifying that they cannot just dismiss liability, I now have the
      confidence to get a solicitor as advised to draft a letter and follow this matter through. I will also foward your email.

      At this stage I am still keen to reach an amicable solution as I cannot see how court action would benefit anyone, but cannot understand the sense or any ethical or legal justification in refusing my original request for fair and reasonable compensation.

      Thanks again for your interest and advise.

      #14290
      Austman
      Flatchatter

        I hope it all works out well.

        But I can see the OC's point of view.  Their building insurance would not always cover carpet or paintwork that is inside a lot – that is the lot owner's property and responsibility to insure.   And if the damage was due to an 'Act of God' you might not have any case to claim against the OC – because they might not be liable.  So OCs and OC's insurers often seem to initially say “we do not cover internal lot carpets or paintwork etc”.

        But if the OC were liable for the damage to your lot (e.g. due to neglect of common property maintenance), then the OC's building insurance should hopefully pay for the your damage under the OC's liability cover.

        #14291
        Anonymous

          “At this stage I am still keen to reach an amicable solution as I cannot see how court action would benefit anyone… ” — Kentstreet, says above.

          The trouble is, so many these days rely on the unwillingness of others, be they Owners Corporations or other individuals, to take the 'court action' required to set things right. 

          Admirable of you Kentstreet, but I reckon you should 'go them' with advice from legal experts asap and you'll get costs too.

          #14293
          Jimmy-T
          Keymaster

            Austman said:

            So OCs and OC's insurers often seem to initially say “we do not cover internal lot carpets or paintwork etc”.

            For some it's ignorance, for others it's a deliberate cop-out.  But if a failure in common property causes damage in anothe property it is the OC's responsibility.

            It doesn't make any difference if a) wear and tear on paintwork and carpets are the lot owner's responsibility; b) the OC is inadequately insured. The OC can't throw the cost back on the lot owners and say “sorry, we weren't insured so we're not paying.”

            It's a double fault for not maintaining common property properly and for not being adequately insured.

            The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
            #14294
            Jimmy-T
            Keymaster

              kentstreet said:

              The executive committee meeting … advised they would direct me to try and claim through their insurance however this seems a “cop out” as we had already been advised previously their insurance would not be responsible for my carpet as it was not a fixture and  would only be responsible for the skirting boards which are a fixture and have very slightly buckled.

              To replace them however would mean repainting which apparently again would be at my own expense so I would rather they remained.

              … the executive committee chairman was sympathetic but basically seems to think if they compensated me it may only make the other owners reluctant to get contents insurance and did not seem to understand the body corporate would be liable.

              Whoever you are dealing with in your Owners Corporation seems to have very little knowledge of strata law.  They have to pay for the paintwork that is required after they have repaired the skirting.  Whatever they damage, directly or indirectly, they have to repair – they are confusing responsibility for wear and tear with responsibility for damage.

              Talk to a lawyer about sending a letter of demand.  You don’t have to claim through their insurance – the Owners Corp do … after they have fixed your apartment which should be their priority.

              And send a motion to the next EC meeting demanding that the office-bearers either undertake some basic strata training (there’s plenty around) or get their strata manager to advise them on the correct procedure before they start giving incorrect and costly advice to owners.

              You are 100% in the right on this and they are 100% liable.  To quote the Urban Spaceman 'go them' if only to teach them a lesson about getting things right rather than coming up with bullcrap about who's responsible and who isn't.

              The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
              #14300
              imported_dech
              Blocked

                    I’d also get an agenda item onto the next general meeting with a view to making a by-law that all quotations for work affecting common property include a separate section for the cost of disposing of waste and some kind of threat that if unsuitable material is washed down the drains they will be pursued to cover all costs etc etc.  Then arrange for the bldg. mgr. to ask workers what the arrangement is; if they have no notion ask them to leave and get someone else.  It would be more involved than this outline but avoiding unexpected sewage backflows is very high up on the priority list.

                   One of my neighbours had a similar problem caused by roots from an unidentified tree; I never go away for long without wondering whether they have now reached my (equally old and probably breached) pipes.  Does anyone think I have any grounds to “demand” that a pre-emptive cleaning/check occur.  I say demand because any form of reasonable request or offer to part pay is unlikely to get a favourable response.

                #14305
                Boronia
                Flatchatter

                  If this type of damage is not, as claimed,  covered by the building insurance, might it not be covered by Public Liability ??

                  #14307
                  Jimmy-T
                  Keymaster

                    I think Owners Corporation insurance  IS a form of public liability insurance.  The problem here is that the people running the Owners Corp had no idea of their responsibilities and came up with all sorts of excuses for not doing what they should have done on Day One: fixed the problem then claimed on their insurance.

                    Considering the size of the building (28 storeys) it's alarming that the people running it are just making up the rules as they go along when a phone call to their strata manager could and should have sorted this out immediately.

                    The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
                    #14309

                    Hi All, agree, so nasty! We recently had two sewer pipe explosions on our property and the filth! And…the bizarre objects! And the cost! kentstreet should seriously be persuing the OC over this. Why should you have to pay for damage that is caused by an issue with CP? Having said that, our plumbers were able to identify where the blockage on our lot was coming from. We immediately sent out a notice to all residents without targetting any one person, so therefore we were accepting responsibility, but advising them of what not to put down their toilets. STRONGLY ADVISING. In the future if a blockage comes from the same area we will I imagine put the onus on that lot for repair. There were items such as nappy bags, tampons, kitty litter, whole vegetables. Luckily the caps on the top of the sewer pipes were loose (plumbers often do this to avoid explosions in lots) so the explosions were downstars rather than in the apartments that had the blockages. If they are tight the explosion is usually in the bathroom floor waste. I think regular checks on pipes may be difficult? And the cost prohibitive? So good luck and I am bloody glad I am not in kentstreets shoes! Touch wood….Embarassed CBF

                    #14339

                    Hi All, I am a bit of course but have a slightly related topic on blocked plumbing. I just heard some interesting information, not sure how true it is. I have heard that some pest inspectors have some device that searches for white ants via an infra red detector that can also detect blockages in pipes. Someone I know has an annual pest inspection that includes searching for blockages in pipes! How cool is that!? I have to do some research for Sydney as the report comes from up north but how much trouble would it save as to have an annual inspection for pests and plumbing? Has anyone else heard of this service?

                    Cheers,

                    CBFCool

                    #14345
                    Boronia
                    Flatchatter

                      It is just a long wire with a small video camera on the end. It is pushed down the pipe, and the operator can see on a screen what is in front. By measuring the length of wire fed out, the location of the camera, and thus blockage, can be determined.

                      #14353

                      Disclaimer: I'm a plumber so clearly biased towards a plumber doing your plumbing inspection 🙂 rather than a pest inspector.

                      Mostly because, whilst on site, your plumber could do so much more than check for blockages: they could identify any upcoming issues to help the building plan for future expenses and even prevent an issue turning into an emergency repair by completing some routine maintenance. 

                      This is particularly important in older buildings where water, waste and gas services are ageing. Just off the top of my head, annual plumbing inspections are an excellent idea because the following could be checked: 

                      • a gully (rather than opening the caps – see post # 11) is designed to allow a backed up sewer to discharge into the garden (rather in people's apartments). If this is filled with dirt (they are usually in the garden somewhere) and a blcoakge occurs, sewer will back up inside the building. They should be cleaned and checked annually. 
                      • Drain camera inspection of pipes (most relevant for older buildings with original sewer system), check the entire length of the pipes and key structures to see if they are emptying correctly, in good condition etc
                      • Visual check of condition of cast iron waste pipes (= “stacks”). Cast iron breaks down and becomes brittle over time. 
                      • main water shut off valve tested: being able to shut water down in the case of any emergency is essential. The valve should be checked once per year. If its not in good working order, Sydney Water can be called out to service it free of charge.
                      • Stormwater pits: checked and cleaned annually (although you can usually get your gardener to do this).  If debris has built up inside, they will overflow in heavy rains.

                      I could go on and on but better stop for fear of boring you to death. Suffice to say, plumbing inspections are a great way to proactively look after the building.
                    Viewing 13 replies - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                    • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

                    Flat Chat Strata Forum Common Property Current Page