• Creator
    Topic
  • #7139
    Anonymous

      As a member of the Executive Committee of a multi-storey
      unit block, we are getting a number of requests from owners to install timber
      or tiled floors. As often commented in Flat Chat this can be a vexed problem
      regarding noise with the minimum (and mandatory since 2004) Building Code of
      Australia (BCA) performance criteria for floor impact sound insulation being
      quite inadequate. It may be of interest that our solution has been to draft a
      bylaw requiring a higher level of sound insulation to that of the BCA.  To minimize technical jargon, the measure of impact
      sound insulation is reduced to a single number given by the parameter Lw;
      the lower the number the better the sound insulation.

      The Association of Australian Acoustical Consultants (AAAC) uses
      this Lw parameter in their star rating system to set an acceptable
      level for impact noise. This systems rates impact noise levels between units on
      a 2-6 star rating; the more stars the better. The lowest rating of 2 stars,
      where impact noise is clearly audible, is where the BCA figure of Lw
      < 62 lies. (The use of ‘<’ means ‘less than’.) At 6 stars (where Lw
      < 40) is where impact noise is essentially inaudible and applies to carpeted
      floors. As it is impossible for hard surface floors to achieve this level we
      have to be satisfied with a 4-star rating (where L
      w < 50 and
      heavier impact noise can still be audible) as the best that can be reasonably achieved
      with appropriate floor impact treatment.

      We had measurements taken in our block and carpeted floors
      gave a low Lw = 33 while a timber floor just made a 4-star rating with
      Lw = 50. Since a bare concrete slab of typically around 230mm thick,
      has an Lw of 73, any floor treatment for a minimum 4-star rating must
      reduce this figure to 50 or better. Thus the difference ΔLw between
      the bare slab and floor covering has to be 23 or better. To quantify this in
      our bylaw for an AAAC  4-star or better rating,
      we simply state floor treatment options are  1) carpet or 2) install a floor impact
      treatment with ΔLw better than 23.

    Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
    • Author
      Replies
    • #12236
      Jimmy-T
      Keymaster

        That seems eminently sensible and well-researched. However, I’m still drawn to the basic by-law that says you can’t disturb the peaceful enjoyment of another’s lot.

        I met someone the other day whose building has a by-law that simply says flooring noise insulation may not be any less effective than carpet with top quality underlay. As a result, they don’t have any timber floors in their units. 

        I don’t see that this is necessarily a bad thing – we simply have no legal or moral right to inflict noise on our neighbours just so we can have a magazine supplement lifestyle. If that’s what people want, pay the money for proper insulation or go and live in a house – don’t expect others to satisfy your fashion needs by putting up with your noise.

        I also feel sorry for owners who are misled by flooring salesmen and the OFT’s lack of clear direction on this into thinking they can just chuck a floor down and their neighbours can’t do anything about it.  That’s a big expense in the cost of the floor, plus the legal costs in having it removed and the social cost of having neighbours at each other’s throats.

        JimmyT

        The opinions offered in these Forum posts and replies are not intended to be taken as legal advice. Readers with serious issues should consult experienced strata lawyers.
      Viewing 1 replies (of 1 total)
      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.